Moro says no omissions or contradictions in responding Lula defense

Throughout the text, the judge also said the eight other arguments of Lula's lawyers, which dealt with defense curtailment, analysis and valuation of testimonials, challenge evidence, and dosimetry pen.
18/07/2017 12h33 - Updated 18/07/2017 12h33
Photo: reproduction

Federal Judge Sérgio Moro published this morning (18) the order with the answers to requests for clarification in the process of Operation Lava jet in which he condemned former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva to nine years in prison. After the decision issued last week, the process received embargoes of defense PT, Petrobras and the Federal Public Ministry (MPF).

Most of the text is to respond to the arguments of Lula's lawyers. Early in, Moro said that the requests for clarification serve for clarification of possible omissions, contradictions and darks, and not to challenge the sentence. "For both, the defense has the way of appeal. Needed this observation because the questions raised by the defense are not suitable amendment of judgment ", the judge said.

Then, Moro prepared answers to Lula's lawyers, who had challenged the judge's role in the prosecution. One of the arguments questioning the magistrate position, it would have stated that the defense adopted “rather questionable tactics”, “of intimidation” or “diversionismo” during the investigation phase.

“Sim, the defense can be combative, but should also maintain civility in treatment with the other parties and the judge, or what, lamentably, It was forgotten by her in several episodes and unhappy, illustratively mentioned only in the sentence ", He said Moro.

Throughout the text, the judge also said the eight other arguments of Lula's lawyers, which dealt with defense curtailment, analysis and valuation of testimonials, challenge evidence, and dosimetry pen. Moro concluded that the requests for clarification of the former president nonexistent omissions notes, obscurities and contradictions, "Should the defense present their arguments challenging the sentence in any appeal and not in incabíveis embargoes".

requests for clarification Petrobras and MPF were only recorded and welcomed by Federal Judge.

Source: Agency Brazil


*** If you are in favor of a totally free and impartial press, collaborate enjoying our page on Facebook and visiting often the AM POST.


Contact Terms of use Wp: (92) 99344-0505